Non-creationist, non-Darwinist, "third way" theories of evolution.
Anti-Darwinism is stupid. Says who?
- Details
- Written by Shaun Johnston Shaun Johnston
- Published: March 2, 2018 March 2, 2018
- Hits: 2575 2575
Searching for "censorship by Google of anti-darwinism" led me to reddit.com and from there to creation.com and a relevant quote from Google's internal guidelines. I signed off at reddit by quoting those guidelines: Google has made public the internal guidelines used by their evaluators to judge search results quality. Buried deep in this document on page 108 is this innocuous statement:
The following should also be rated "Fails to Meet" because they lead to very poor and upsetting user experiences: …
● Pages that directly contradict well-established scientific or medical consensus for queries seeking scientific or medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
I had my answer: Google does feel entitled to suppress anti-Darwinist opinions. More...
Terms & Conditions
Subscribe
Report
My comments