Non-creationist, non-Darwinist, "third way" theories of evolution.
Logical flaw in darwinism
- Written by Shaun Johnston Shaun Johnston
- Published: September 19, 2013 September 19, 2013
- Hits: 84959 84959
How elementary could the flaws in Darwin's logic be? How's this?
Only one or two of each living creature's progeny get to reproduce and pass on their genes (natural selection). Every few hundred million years there's a huge meteor impact. Therefore, natural selection causes meteor impacts.
Compare that with the following:
Only one or two of each living creature's progeny get to reproduce and pass on their genes (natural selection). Over millions of years species of living creatures tend to evolve. Therefore, natural selection causes evolution.
I think the logic in both is the same. Both are examples of post hoc ergo propter hoc, the fallacy of assuming that because one thing happens before another it must have caused the other. More...
Terms & Conditions